From customer portals to ERP integrations, we design, build and support the systems your business runs on. The architecture is written down before the first commit, and the documentation, tests and runbooks arrive with the code.
Decisions and trade-offs documented before the build starts.
Test evidence
Automated tests, with results published for every release.
Documentation
API specifications, runbooks and structured knowledge transfer.
SLA-backed support
Optional support tiers once the system is live.
Services
Six services, one delivery standard.
Pick the one that fits your situation, or combine them. Every service includes the architecture dossier, test evidence and handover documentation.
01
Custom Enterprise Software Development
Design and build of web platforms, internal tools, customer portals and APIs — from requirements through deployment, with documentation and knowledge transfer.
Format & pricing
Project or dedicated team; scoped per engagement.
Architecture dossier
OpenAPI specs
Test evidence
02
Legacy Modernization & Cloud Migration
Re-architecting aging systems into maintainable, cloud-native services, with incremental migration strategies that avoid big-bang risk.
Format & pricing
Fixed-price assessment first, then a phased project.
System map
Migration plan
Parallel-run results
03
Systems Integration & API Engineering
Connecting ERPs, CRMs, data platforms and third-party services with robust, well-documented APIs and event pipelines.
Format & pricing
Project, scoped per engagement.
Interface catalog
AsyncAPI specs
Replay procedures
04
Product Engineering for Startups
MVP to scale: architecture, build and iteration for funded startups that need senior engineering capacity fast.
Format & pricing
Dedicated team, billed monthly.
Architecture runway
Release pipeline
Handover plan
05
Dedicated Teams & Staff Augmentation
Senior engineers, architects and leads embedded with your team, working under your direction and your delivery process.
Format & pricing
Monthly per-seat rates.
Named engineers
Onboarding in days
Monthly reporting
06
Managed Support & Maintenance
SLA-backed support, monitoring, security patching and continuous improvement for systems we build or inherit.
Format & pricing
Monthly retainer with SLA tiers.
Runbook
SLA reporting
Patch cadence
Engagement models
Choose how we work together.
Match the model to how certain your scope is and who will run the system afterwards. Many clients start with a fixed-scope phase and move to a team or retainer.
Engagement models compared by fit, pricing, team and cadence
Compare
Fixed-scope projectFor work you can define up front.
Dedicated teamFor evolving scope and steady capacity.
Support retainerFor live systems that need an SLA.
Fits when
Scope and acceptance criteria can be written down: a new build, a migration phase or an integration.
Scope will evolve and you want senior engineers working to your roadmap, month after month.
The system is live and needs monitoring, patching and steady improvement.
How it’s priced
Fixed price per phase, based on a written scope and estimate.
Monthly per-seat rates. Scale up or down with a month’s notice.
Monthly retainer by SLA tier, with enhancement hours included.
Team
Technical lead, delivery lead and engineers sized to the scope.
Named senior engineers, architects and leads, working under your direction.
A support team that knows the system, with named escalation contacts.
Cadence
Two-week iterations with a demo and a written report.
Your ceremonies and tools, plus a monthly report from us.
Monthly service report and a review after every major incident.
You own
In every model: all code, documentation and intellectual property, from day one — in repositories you control.
Enterprise-grade delivery
Included in every engagement, not sold as extras.
Documentation, testing, handover and support are part of the offer. They are written into the statement of work, so nobody has to negotiate for them later.
Documentation
Architecture dossier and ADR log
OpenAPI and AsyncAPI specifications
Infrastructure-as-code documentation
Testing
Test plan agreed before the build
Automated unit, integration and contract tests
Results published with every release
Handover
Runbooks and operational training
Structured knowledge-transfer sessions
A warranty period after go-live
Support
Optional SLA tiers by severity
Monitoring and security patching
A monthly service report
Technology
The stack we build on.
We choose tools for the people who will run the system in five years, and we write down why.
Across every engagement
Languages
Java
Kotlin
Go
TypeScript
Python
Rust
Solidity
Cloud & platform
AWS
Microsoft Azure
Google Cloud
Kubernetes
Terraform
GitHub Actions
Data & integration
PostgreSQL
Apache Kafka
Debezium CDC
Redis
OpenTelemetry
REST & gRPC
Ledger platforms
Hyperledger Fabric
Hyperledger Besu
Quorum
Corda
Ethereum & EVM chains
FAQ
Questions CTOs ask us
Still have a question? Ask an engineer directly — you’ll get a straight answer.
Security is part of the design, not a final check. We threat-model during architecture, run static analysis and dependency scanning in every pipeline, keep secrets in a vault rather than in code, and apply least-privilege access to every environment. Engineers work on managed, encrypted devices. We follow your security policies, can map our controls to ISO 27001 or SOC 2, and arrange independent penetration testing before major releases.
Q.02Who owns the code and intellectual property?
You do. Our contracts assign all code, documentation and designs created for your engagement to you. Work lives in repositories you own from day one, so nothing needs to be handed back at the end. Open-source components are used only under licenses you approve and are recorded in a dependency register. If we reuse any of our pre-existing tooling, you receive a perpetual license to it.
Q.03What documentation do you provide?
Every engagement produces an architecture dossier before build starts, and we keep it current. Alongside it you get architecture decision records, API specifications in OpenAPI or AsyncAPI, a test plan with results, infrastructure-as-code documentation and an operations runbook. Documentation is reviewed in the same pull requests as code and is part of our definition of done. It is written for the team that will run the system after us.
Q.04How do your estimates work?
We estimate in ranges and write the assumptions down. Well-defined work can be fixed price; evolving scope runs on time and materials with a capped budget per phase. Larger programs start with a short discovery or a fixed-price assessment, so the build estimate rests on evidence rather than guesswork. We re-forecast at every phase boundary and tell you early if the range moves.
Q.05Who will be on our team, and how senior are they?
Every engagement has a named technical lead, usually an architect or principal engineer, and a delivery lead. The rest of the team is sized to the work and weighted toward senior engineers. You meet the proposed team before signing, and the people you meet are the people who do the work. Any change to the team is agreed with you in advance and comes with a proper handover.
Q.06What about working hours, time zones and communication?
We agree core overlap hours at kickoff, typically at least four hours a day in your time zone. Teams run two-week iterations with a demo and a written progress report at the end of each, a weekly check-in with your sponsor, and a shared channel for day-to-day questions. Decisions and risks are logged where you can see them, so nothing important lives only in a meeting.
Q.07What happens after launch?
Handover is planned from the start: runbooks, operational training and a warranty period are part of every delivery. After that, you can run the system in-house or move to a Managed Support & Maintenance agreement. Our SLA tiers set response and resolution times by severity, cover monitoring, security patching and minor enhancements, and include a monthly service report. Many clients keep us on support while their own team grows into the system.
Q.08Can we start small?
Yes, and we often recommend it. A fixed-price assessment, a short discovery phase or a single well-bounded feature is a good way to see how we work before committing to a larger program. Each produces documents you own, such as an architecture sketch, a prioritized backlog and an estimate, so the work is useful whether or not you continue with us.
We replaced spreadsheet-driven matching with an event-driven reconciliation service that ingests scheme, bank and ledger files, matches them with deterministic rules and routes exceptions to an operations queue.
Asked to assess a blockchain registry, we found one accountable operator and no case for disintermediation. We recommended PostgreSQL with a hash-chained, append-only audit log, then delivered it.
We moved every interface from an end-of-life integration engine to a FHIR-based API layer and event bus, migrating in phases with parallel runs so no ward lost a feed.